We won the first round! UUSJ helped push to proposal the Electoral Count Act.

Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your web browser

Our Advocacy Matters

Dear Friend,

Last week UUSJ saw a victory and noteworthy progress towards a legislative goal, we want to highlight for you. 

On July 20, 2022, Senator Collin (R-ME) announced (press release) on behalf of a group of bipartisan Senators the introduction of the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act (Act), no bill number yet, to reform and modernize the Electoral Count Act of 1887.

This proposal contains provisions that UUSJ has advocated for in numerous meetings with Senate offices, led by our Democracy Action Team volunteers and joined by UUs from across the United States. This comes after the devastating dereliction of duty and failed vote on the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act in late January.

Friend, here is a quick overview of what we won in the first round of advocacy:

1. The Act clarifies the purely ceremonial role of the Vice President. Subsection 109 of the Act clarifies that the vice president merely presides over the joint session of Congress to count electoral votes.

2. The Act would raise the threshold for lodging an objection and limit the grounds for objecting to slates of electors. Subsection 109 of the Act would raise the threshold to lodge an objection to the certification of a state's electors to at least one-fifth of the members of both the House and Senate, rather than simply one member from each chamber. Another small but important improvement found in Subsection 109 makes it less likely that there would be no candidate who obtained a majority of all electors.

3. The Act would prevent submission of alternative slates of electors and provide expedited but limited judicial review. Section 104 of the proposed Act would take steps to prevent the confusion and chaos that can arise through the submission of alternative slates of electors. It makes clear that a State’s Governor, or the official enumerated in a state constitution, is the only person authorized to issue a certificate of ascertainment of electors.

4. The Act gets rid of the troublesome concept of a “failed election.” Section 102 of the Act makes clear that electors “shall be appointed on election day, in accordance with the laws of the State enacted prior to election day.”  The Act also contains, in Title II, provisions designed to insure that, in situations where there is a legitimate dispute as to the winner of a presidential election, both candidates will get financial assistance and assistance from Executive Branch agencies during the transition period prior to January 20.

You can see our unabridged preliminary evaluation of the ECA proposal, for more detail on each item.

Our ASK

Friend, UUSJ expects to engage in various ways throughout the process. We need to see an avalanche of principled concern for ECA reform, and for that, we need you to act. Now!

As of this moment, just over 600 of you have taken the action, if all of us at UUSJ take the action it'd be a noteworthy expression of our principled concern to our federal legislators.

At this juncture, we ask you to:

• Take the ECA action (button)
• Spread the word, inviting your UU friends to join you (https://bit.ly/whwn_eca)
• Review our video to educate yourself about the issue (button), and
• Consider a donation to further the work. 

This may not be the last time we ask you to act for the passage of an ECA proposal, but it is what the circumstance calls for at this moment.

What Comes Next

Friend, here is what we can tell you about what is likely to come next:

• Our meetings on this matter confirmed what we heard from Cerin Lindgrensavage, Counsel at Protect Democracy, during our Expert Opinion Briefing, that the "aperture" for passing a democracy bill in the 117th Congress is exceedingly narrow.  And it's the ECA that has the best bipartisan chance. While months remain till the close of 2022, only about 12 legislative work weeks appear on the Senate calendar.
• The Senate will move to markup the bill in the Senate Rules Committee, with a hearing expected in a matter of weeks, but most likely after the August recess. Sen. Klobuchar (D-MN) needs to set the date and move things. And we may need to do some flash advocacy to protect the provisions we like from nuisance amendments. 
• The Senate will then likely throttle down the discussion of the ECA till after the midterms for political, not legislative reasons. Members of the GOP seem concerned about attacks from the Trump camp of the GOP during the election high season. So the lame duck session will be key and when we are likely to see action.
• In the lame-duck, the bipartisan group expects to lose votes on either side of the aisle but aims for a healthy majority of more than 61 votes. This means whether or not Minority Leader McConnell (R-KY) signals Senators are free to vote their conscience will play a significant political role. It also means that some Democrats may need to be convinced to support despite their disappointment with the January vote. 
• While Sen. Collins is renowned for her ability to keep the Minority Leader bought into her efforts, nothing is guaranteed. And Majority Leader Schumer will have some elbows to grab, and ears to bend.
• The circumstance in the House is less clear, the aspiration is that what comes out of the Senate and its bipartisan approach will drive what is proposed in the lower chamber.